首页> 外文OA文献 >Investigation of Prediction Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Parameter Stability of Large-Scale Propagation Path Loss Models for 5G Wireless Communications
【2h】

Investigation of Prediction Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Parameter Stability of Large-Scale Propagation Path Loss Models for 5G Wireless Communications

机译:5G无线通信大规模传播路径损耗模型的预测精度,灵敏度和参数稳定性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper compares three candidate large-scale propagation path loss models for use over the entire microwave and millimeter-wave (mmWave) radio spectrum: the alpha–beta–gamma (ABG) model, the close-in (CI) free-space reference distance model, and the CI model with a frequency-weighted path loss exponent (CIF). Each of these models has been recently studied for use in standards bodies such as 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) and for use in the design of fifth generation wireless systems in urban macrocell, urban microcell, and indoor office and shopping mall scenarios. Here, we compare the accuracy and sensitivity of these models using measured data from 30 propagation measurement data sets from 2 to 73 GHz over distances ranging from 4 to 1238 m. A series of sensitivity analyses of the three models shows that the physically based two-parameter CI model and three-parameter CIF model offer computational simplicity, have very similar goodness of fit (i.e., the shadow fading standard deviation), exhibit more stable model parameter behavior across frequencies and distances, and yield smaller prediction error in sensitivity tests across distances and frequencies, when compared to the four-parameter ABG model. Results show the CI model with a 1-m reference distance is suitable for outdoor environments, while the CIF model is more appropriate for indoor modeling. The CI and CIF models are easily implemented in existing 3GPP models by making a very subtle modification.
机译:本文比较了在整个微波和毫米波(mmWave)无线电频谱中使用的三种候选大规模传播路径损耗模型:α–β–γ(ABG)模型,近距离(CI)自由空间参考距离模型,以及具有频率加权路径损耗指数(CIF)的CI模型。最近研究了这些模型中的每一种,以用于诸如第三代合作伙伴计划(3GPP)之类的标准机构,以及用于设计城市宏小区,城市微小区以及室内办公和购物商场场景中的第五代无线系统。在这里,我们使用30个传播测量数据集(从2到73 GHz)在4到1238 m范围内的测量数据来比较这些模型的准确性和敏感性。对这三个模型的一系列敏感性分析表明,基于物理的两参数CI模型和三参数CIF模型提供了计算简单性,具有非常相似的拟合优度(即阴影淡入标准差),展现出更稳定的模型参数与四参数ABG模型相比,在跨距离和跨频率的灵敏度测试中产生较小的预测误差,并且在跨距离和跨频率的灵敏度测试中产生较小的预测误差。结果表明,参考距离为1 m的CI模型适用于室外环境,而CIF模型更适用于室内建模。通过进行非常细微的修改,可以轻松地在现有3GPP模型中实现CI和CIF模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号